GEODETIC ASSESSMENT OF STRUCTURAL DEFLECTIONS IN A HIGH-RISE BUILDING UNDERGOING CONTROLLED DEMOLITION USING TOTAL STATION MEASUREMENTS

Main Article Content

Geoffrey Ogbonna Nwodo
Joseph Olayemi Odumosu

Abstract

Geodetic monitoring via Total Station (TS) surveying provides a model-independent framework for characterizing quasi-static structural displacement in high-rise reinforced concrete buildings undergoing controlled deconstruction; hence, augmenting vibration-based methods that are constrained in addressing gradually accumulating deformation. This paper presents a systematic, six-campaign TS displacement analysis conducted over 47 days on a 14-storey RC study building undergoing NDT-informed controlled deconstruction in Lagos, Nigeria. Taking multiple floor-level measurements on bother both left and right sides with 24 prism targets on Floors 2–13. The baseline displacement profile for the right face followed a second-order polynomial distribution that depended on height with R² = 0.933. The highest observed displacement was 15.53 mm at Floor 2. The active penthouse deconstruction caused a statistically significant increase in displacement with cumulative right-face displacements reaching 31.08 mm representing 102% increase over baseline. The average growth rates were 0.46 mm/day on the right face and 0.29 mm/day on the left face, with the highest rate being 0.74 mm/day on Floor 2. The global tilt at Floor 2 went up from 222.4 to 445.2 millidegrees and remained constant after week 4. The maximum displacement was 31.1% of the 100 mm safety threshold, which was the highest. The validated geodetic dataset can be used as the principal reference for cross-validation with associated vibration sensor and differential GNSS measurements in further studies.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

Section

Articles

Author Biographies

Geoffrey Ogbonna Nwodo, University of Benin

Department of Geomatics

Joseph Olayemi Odumosu, University of Benin

Department of Geomatics

References

Carden, E. P., & Fanning, P. (2004). Vibration based condition monitoring: A review. Structural Health Monitoring, 3(4), 355–377. https://doi.org/10.1177/1475921704047500

Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Doebling, S. W., Farrar, C. R., & Prime, M. B. (1998). A summary review of vibration-based damage identification methods. The Shock and Vibration Digest, 30(2), 91–105.

Fan, H., Peng, H., Li, W., & Huang, Q. (2020). Measurement of quasi-static and dynamic displacements of footbridges using the composite instrument of a SmartStation and an accelerometer. Remote Sensing, 12(16), 2635. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12162635

Farrar, C. R., & Worden, K. (2007). An introduction to structural health monitoring. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 365(1851), 303–315. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2006.1928

International Organization for Standardization. (2017). Accuracy in building — Part 1: Methods for measurement and evaluation (ISO 7976-1:2017). Geneva, Switzerland: Author.

Lienhart, W. (2017). Geotechnical monitoring using total stations and laser scanners: Critical aspects and solutions. Journal of Civil Structural Health Monitoring, 7(3), 315–324. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13349-017-0228-5

Scaioni, M., Marsella, M., Crosetto, M., Tornatore, V., & Wang, J. (2018). Geodetic and remote-sensing sensors for dam deformation monitoring. Sensors, 18(11), 3682. https://doi.org/10.3390/s18113682

Yuzbasi, J. (2025). Fundamentals of Controlled Demolition in Structures: Real-Life Applications, Discrete Element Methods, Monitoring, and Artificial Intelligence-Based Research Directions. Buildings, 15(19), 3501. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15193501